Announcement PDF ASX Announcement 14 September 2026 | ASX: CRI CRITICA LIMITED Level 2, 16 Altona Street, West Perth, Western Australia ABN 51 119 678 385 T: +61 8 6279 9428 E: admin@critica.limited critica.limited Critica Updates Mt Lindsay Tin-Tungsten Mineral Resource to JORC 2012 Project-wide Mineral Resource of 19 Mt @ 1.09% SnEQ, containing 49 kt tin and 28 kt WO₃ at a 0.4% SnEQ cut-off Deposit Material class Million Tonnes SnEQ % Sn % WO3 % DTR Mass Recovery % Sn tonnes WO3 tonnes Iron Ore tonnes Main & No.2 Indicated 12 1.22 0.24 0.17 13 28,000 20,000 1,500,000 Main & No.2 Inferred 2.3 0.85 0.16 0.12 12 3,800 2,700 280,000 Livingstone Inferred 4.4 0.88 0.29 0.11 na 13,000 4,700 na Reward Indicated 0.34 1.06 0.81 0.05 na 2,700 150 na Reward Inferred 0.23 1.07 0.78 0.05 na 1,800 120 na PROJECT TOTAL (INDICATED + INFERRED) 19 1.09 0.26 0.15 9.3 49,000 28,000 1,800,000 Notes: • na not estimated • The formula used to calculate the Sn equivalent values for the Main and No.2 deposits is SnEQ (%) = Sn% + (WO3% x 5.556) + (DTR Mass Recovery x 0.002556), and for Livingstone and Reward SnEQ % = Sn % + (WO3% x 5.556). • The Sn equivalent formulae use a tin metal price of US$45,000/t, an APT (Ammonium Para Tungstate) price of US$2500/mtu (1mtu =10kgs of WO3) and a 65% iron ore price of US$115/t. Copper is not included in the Sn equivalent. • Iron Ore mass recovery was determined by Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) testing (90% of data set) and regression of the magnetic susceptibility according to the formula DTR Mass Recovery % = Magnetic susceptibility 10-3 SI units x 0.0318 + 4.6278 as established from the DTR work. • Pilot-scale test work on approximately 3 tonnes of representative Main and No.2 deposit material produced a 45% Sn concentrate at an overall tin recovery of 72%, a tungsten concentrate exceeding 66% WO₃ at an overall tungsten recovery of 83% to APT, and a 65% Fe Iron Ore at 98% recovery (refer Venture Minerals announcement to ASX dated 31 August 2012). • Further bulk and pilot metallurgical test work is in progress on selected mineralisation types to optimise concentrate grades and recoveries. • In the Company’s opinion, all elements included in the metal equivalent calculation have a reasonable potential to be recovered and sold. • Project Total comprises Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources. Figures may not sum due to rounding. • Refer to Table 1 notes for further details regarding metal equivalents. 2 Critica Limited (ASX: CRI) (“Critica” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce the restatement of the Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for its 100%-owned Mt Lindsay Tin-Tungsten Project in northwest Tasmania in accordance with the JORC Code (2012). The restated Mineral Resource encompasses the Main and No.2, Livingstone and Reward deposits, providing a current JORC 2012 resource base for the continued evaluation and advancement of the Mt Lindsay Project, as set out in Table 1. Critica’s CEO Jacob Deysel commented: “Mt Lindsay is one of Australia’s largest undeveloped tin-tungsten resources with both metals playing vital role in modern industry. Tungsten is a critical mineral with essential applications across defence, aerospace and advanced manufacturing, while tin is fundamental to electronics and semiconductors. The JORC 2012 restatement provides a clear and current view of the scale and quality of the Mt Lindsay Mineral Resource, with a project-wide Mineral Resource of 19 Mt @ 1.09% SnEQ, containing approximately 49 kt of tin and 28 kt of WO₃ at a 0.4% SnEQ cut-off, comprising Indicated and Inferred Resources. The timing is also compelling. Tin and tungsten markets have strengthened significantly, while the strategic importance of secure Western supply chains for these metals continues to grow. With its substantial tin and tungsten resource, established infrastructure advantages and location in Tasmania, we believe Mt Lindsay has the potential to become an important Australian source of these strategically important metals.” Mt Lindsay Highlights • 19 Mt @ 1.09% SnEQ (Indicated and Inferred), containing approximately 49 kt tin and 28 kt WO₃, at a 0.4% SnEQ cut-off. • Indicated Resources of approximately 12 Mt, containing approximately 31 kt tin and 20 kt WO₃. • One of Australia’s largest undeveloped tin-tungsten resources, located in the established mining region of northwest Tasmania. • Significant tungsten resource of approximately 28 kt contained WO₃, provides exposure to a critical mineral vital to defence, aerospace and advanced manufacturing. • Strategic exposure to both tin and tungsten, supporting technologies and industries increasingly important to secure Western supply chains. • Extensively drilled mineral system, with more than 88,000 metres of diamond drilling completed across the Project. • Established infrastructure advantage, with access to existing road and power infrastructure, including Tasmania’s renewable hydroelectric power network. • Resource growth potential, with the Main and No.2 mineralised systems remaining open down plunge. • Mt Lindsay and Jupiter Scoping Studies progressing, both targeted for completion by end Q3 2026. 3 Mt Lindsay Mineral Resource The Mt Lindsay Mineral Resource comprises the Main and No.2, Livingstone and Reward deposits, which together form the JORC 2012 Mineral Resource reported in this announcement. Figure 1 | High-Grade Tungsten Mineralisation at Mt Lindsay Figure 1 | High-grade tungsten mineralisation at Mt Lindsay. Scheelite (tungsten mineral) fluorescing under ultraviolet light in drill core from ML340M, which intersected 147m @ 1.0% Sn and 0.2% WO₃. Refer ASX announcement dated 16 December 2021. Figure 2 | Mt Lindsay Tin-Tungsten Deposits and Priority Targets Figure 2 | Mt Lindsay Project showing the Main and No.2, Livingstone and Reward deposits that comprise the Mineral Resource reported in this announcement, together with other known mineralised areas and priority exploration targets. 4 Historical Resource Context Mt Lindsay has a long history of exploration and resource definition, with more than 88,000 metres of diamond drilling completed across the Project by previous owners and Critica (formerly Venture Minerals Limited). Previous Mineral Resource estimates for Mt Lindsay were prepared and reported under an earlier edition of the JORC Code. The Mineral Resource reported in this announcement restates the Main and No.2, Livingstone and Reward deposits in accordance with the JORC Code (2012), based on the available geological, drilling, sampling and estimation information. Project Location and Infrastructure The Mt Lindsay Project is located in northwest Tasmania, approximately 20 kilometres west of the Renison Bell tin mine, within an established mining district. The Project benefits from access to existing road and power infrastructure, including Tasmania’s established hydroelectric power network. Figure 3 | Mt Lindsay Location and Established Infrastructure Figure 3 | Location of Critica’s wholly owned Mt Lindsay Tin-Tungsten Project in northwest Tasmania. The Project is situated within an established mining region with access to existing road and power infrastructure, including Tasmania’s hydroelectric power network. 5 Mineral Resource Estimation Details The following is a material information summary relating to the MRE, consistent with ASX Listing Rule 5.8.1 requirements. Further details are provided in JORC Code Table 1, which is included as Appendix A. Geology and Geological Interpretation The Mt Lindsay tin, tungsten and magnetite deposits are hosted by the Neoproterozoic Success Creek Group and Crimson Creek Formation within the southern contact metamorphic aureole of the Meredith Granite. The Meredith Granite is part of a suite of Devonian granites associated with significant tin- tungsten mineralisation in Tasmania, and deposits associated with this suite include the Renison Bell and Mt Bischoff tin mines, the Cleveland tin-copper mine, and the King Island tungsten mine. Exploration indicates the presence of at least eight magnetite-tin-tungsten skarn, greisenised skarn and carbonate replacement deposits in the Mt Lindsay area. The Main and No.2 deposits are hosted by calcareous sandstone horizons within the Crimson Creek Formation, while the Reward and Livingstone deposits are hosted by dolostone and conglomerate units straddling the boundary of the Success Creek Group and Crimson Creek Formation. The Main and No.2 deposits strike east southeast away from contact with the Meredith Granite and dip ranges from c. 75° NE to 65° SW (Figures 6 and 7). The granite contacts and lower margin of mineralisation dip moderately to the southeast beneath the Main and No.2 deposits, and granite dykes flank the down dip parts so that the skarns form keels plunging away to the southeast (Figure 6). Magnetite, tin and tungsten mineralisation is intermittently exposed at the surface for c. 950 m along the Main skarn and c. 750 m for the No.2 skarn, then the top of mineralisation plunges moderately southeast at 20-50° for at least a further 200-1200 m for both deposits. True mineralisation thickness within each deposit is typically 10-35 m, and in parts reaches c.70 m. Approximately 150-200 m of hornfels separate the Main and No.2 skarns, and both deposits are cut and offset approx. 60 m into two parts each by the southeast dipping Tulloch Fault. The Livingstone and Reward deposits are moderately to steeply dipping bodies hosted by carbonates that form keels within the margin of the Meredith granite and plunge moderately southeast from gossan outcrops that were historically mined for tin. Figure 4 | Main and No.2 Deposit Geology and Mineralisation Figure 4 | Geological interpretation of the Main and No.2 deposits showing the principal geological units and key tin and tungsten mineralisation trends. 6 Figure 5 | Main and No.2 Mineralisation Models Figure 5 | Oblique 3D views of the Main and No.2 mineralisation models (purple and blue, respectively) within southeast-plunging furrows in the Meredith Granite (pink). Ground surface is shown by the brown mesh; sedimentary wall rocks and the Tulloch Fault are omitted for clarity. Figure 6 | Livingstone and Reward Mineralisation Models Figure 6 | Oblique 3D views of the Livingstone and Reward mineralisation models (light and dark green, respectively) within southeast-plunging furrows in the Meredith Granite (pink). Carbonate host units are omitted for clarity. Drilling Methods Some 428 diamond core drill holes for 78,556 m were used to geologically define the resources reported here, including 49 holes for 11,787 m drilled by previous explorers. Of this drilling some 122 holes for 25,582 m pierced the Main deposit resource, 134 holes for 27,650 m pierced the No.2 deposit (six holes pierced the immediately adjacent Main and No.2 deposits), 52 holes for 7,198m pierced the Livingstone deposit and 20 holes for 2,953 m pierced the Reward deposit. Of the total 323 drill holes used for the reported resource estimation some 21 holes for 4,761 m core of mainly BQ size (36.5mm diameter) were drilled by the previous owners; the other 302 drill holes for 56,965 m were drilled by Venture Minerals with most of the core being NQ size (47.6mm diameter) and HQ size (63.5mm diameter). Drill hole spacing within the Main and No.2 deposits ranges from approximately 20 m by 10 m to a maximum of c. 120 m, and drill hole spacing in the Livingstone and Reward deposits ranges from approximately 25 m by 10 m to a maximum of c. 100 m. 7 Sampling and Assay Methods All Venture Minerals drill core was sampled by core saw in a continuous and volumetrically consistent basis in largely 2 m intervals through the mineralised zones. Previous owners’ drill core was sampled in a similar way by core saw or core splitter generally in 3 feet or 1 metre intervals. Approximately one quarter core field duplicate per mineralised zone was submitted for assay by Venture Minerals. Venture Minerals drill core samples were submitted to ALS Geochemistry and SGS for preparation and assaying. All assays used for the Mineral Resource estimation were completed by laboratory XRF. Previous owners generally determined Sn and WO3 by XRF and previous owner assays were used for 18 drill holes (c.4% of total assays). The current estimate was modelled from generally 2 m downhole composites, consistent with the dominant sample interval. Irregular composites do not account for a significant proportion of the final datasets. DTR Mass Recovery, representing the proportion of resource recoverable as a magnetite Iron Ore concentrate, was determined by Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) analyses for 90% of the composited assay intervals used in the Main and No.2 Mineral Resource estimation. DTR Mass Recovery for the remaining assay intervals was calculated by regression of the magnetic susceptibility according to the formula DTR Mass Recovery % = Magnetic susceptibility 10-3 SI units x 0.0318 + 4.6278. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures The data collection programs included industry-standard quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) procedures. Venture Minerals QAQC samples included assay standards (approximately 1 per 20 samples) and field duplicates (typically one quarter core duplicate per mineralised zone) submitted with each drill hole, together with blanks, independent laboratory checks, field and laboratory sample weight monitoring, and periodic laboratory grinding checks. The QC data is considered acceptable for the Mineral Resource estimate. No QC information was available for drilling completed by previous owners; however, results from drilling conducted in separate campaigns are considered compatible. Drill hole spacing was such that twinned drill holes were not considered necessary. Data was collected, received and stored in industry-standard ways, and no adjustments were made to assay data supplied by the laboratories. Bulk Density Bulk densities for the Mineral Resource estimates were determined using volumetric and relative mass- in-air and mass-in-water methods on the drill core on a routine basis. Fresh rock zone densities for the Main and No.2 deposits were interpolated to the block model using the same technique as for grade estimation, with a separate domain created for weathered materials (clay saprolite zone) and assigned an average density 1.7 t/m3 . The mean density for the Main Skarn was 3.39 t/m3 , whilst for the No. 2 Skarn it was 3.58 t/m3 . Densities for the Livingstone and Reward deposits were interpolated to the block model using the same technique as the grade estimation. Average densities were 2.58 t/m3 for the Livingstone deposit and 2.21 t/m3 for Reward. Mineralisation Modelling and Estimation Methodology Three-dimensional mineralisation wireframes were created for all deposits via cross sectional interpretation in Micromine software to constrain the block modelling and resource estimation. Lower grade thresholds of c. 0.1% Sn, 0.05% WO3 and 15% DTR Mass Recovery at minimum widths of c. 2-4 m were adopted for the mineralisation wireframing. Isolated pods of mineralisation c. <2 m without demonstrable continuity were not modelled. Four discrete wireframes were created for the tin and DTR Mass Recovery and three for tungsten mineralisation within the Main and No. 2 deposits. These wireframes were then divided into geometrical subdomains, resulting in a total of 16 domains (six for tin, five each for tungsten and DTR Mass Recovery) and were filled with blocks of 10 m x 5 m x 2.5 m xyz dimension with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 1.25 m sub-blocking. Two mineralisation wireframes were created for the Livingstone deposit and four for the Reward deposit, and all were filled with blocks of 10 m x 5 m x 2.5 m 8 xyz dimensions with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 1.25 m sub-blocking. The mineralisation wireframes cover approx. 1,300 m strike extent of the Main skarn and 1,500 m strike extent of the No.2 skarn, from surface to a depth of c. 600 m, and are typically 20-40 m thickness, locally up to c. 60 m thickness. The Livingstone mineralisation model has c. 1,700 m strike extent and reaches up to 90 m thickness extending from surface to c. 250 m depth. The Reward model has c. 500 m strike extent, up to 70 m combined lode sectional thickness and reaches c. 150 m depth from surface outcrop. A minor amount of mineralisation is beyond the wireframes and excluded from this Mineral Resource estimate because of uncertain continuity, narrowness (<2-4m) or low grade. Sn, WO3, DTR Mass Recovery and Cu intersections from within the wireframes relevant to this Mineral Resource estimate are listed in Table 2 below. Cu was not used to define the mineralisation wireframes. Statistical evaluation, geostatistical modelling and the 3D block modelling was then carried out by suitably qualified Venture Minerals personnel using Micromine software. Directional semi variograms show ranges of c. 70 m for DTR Mass Recovery within the Main deposit, and c. 70 m for high grade and c. 40 m for low grade DTR Mass Recovery populations within the No.2 deposit. Sn and WO3 populations are positively skewed and variography was performed on logarithmic scales. Top cuts of 10% and 4% were applied to Sn and WO3 respectively. Variograms show a primary down plunge axis range of 70 m for both Sn and WO3 in the Main deposit, and 70 m for Sn in the No.2 deposit. WO3 variograms for the No.2 deposit show a range of 60 m in the primary down plunge axis. Sn, WO3 and DTR Mass Recovery grades were then interpolated via Ordinary Kriging to the Main and No.2 deposit block models separately, with an initial search ellipse of 69 m x 53 m x 6 m for DTR Mass Recovery, 68 m x 70 m x 8 m for Sn and 73 m x 40 m x 8 m for WO3, oriented parallel to the strike and dip of the mineralised skarn, as indicated by the variography supported grade x thickness long sectional interpretation. The initial searches were followed by progressively more relaxed searches using ellipses of the same dimensional ratio until all blocks were assigned a Sn, WO3 and DTR Mass Recovery values. Four sectors were used for each search ellipse with a maximum of 10 points per sector, and a minimum of 4 points for the first search followed by more relaxed search criteria down to a minimum of 2 points for subsequent searches. After validation the separately estimated Sn, WO3 and DTR Mass Recovery were then written to one block model for the Main and No.2 deposits, along with combined mineralisation wireframes. Grade histograms indicate single Cu population with low variability, and Cu was estimated into the Main and No.2 block model using Inverse Distance Squared methodology with an initial search ellipse of 50 m x 25 m x 8 m oriented parallel to the strike and dip of the mineralisation wireframes. Four sectors were used for each search ellipse, with a maximum of 6 samples per sector. Sn and WO3 grades were estimated to the Livingstone block model by Ordinary Kriging, with initial search ellipses of 30 x 10 x 7 m for Sn and 25 x 15 x 9 m for WO3 as determined by variography. Four sectors were used for each search ellipse with a maximum of 6 points per sector, and a minimum of 3 points for the first search followed by more relaxed search criteria down to a minimum of one point for subsequent searches. Sn and WO3 grades were estimated to the Reward model using the Inverse Distance Squared method with an initial search ellipse of 25 x 25 x 5 m oriented parallel to the strike and dip of the mineralised skarn. Four sectors were used for each search ellipse with a maximum of 6 points per sector, and a minimum of 3 points for the first search followed by 2 points for subsequent searches. 9 Figure 7 | Key Sn, WO3 and DTR Mass Recovery semi variograms. Main deposit Sn variogram, primary direction No.2 deposit Sn variogram, primary direction Main deposit WO3 variogram, primary direction Main deposit DTR Mass Recovery variogram, primary direction 10 No.2 deposit WO3 variogram, primary direction No.2 deposit high-grade DTR Mass Recovery variogram, primary direction No.2 deposit low-grade DTR Mass Recovery variogram, primary direction Figure 7 | Key directional semi-variograms for Sn (tin), WO₃ (tungsten) and DTR Mass Recovery used in the Mineral Resource estimation. The final models were graphically reviewed in Micromine. The models were coloured by different attributes and overlain on section and flitch with the supporting drill hole data for visual validation. SWATH plots were created to compare block model grade and density estimates with the corresponding composited downhole assay dataset. Mineral Resource classification for the Main and No.2 deposits was based on the variography run during the Ordinary Kriging estimation process for tungsten (with the shortest principal ranges). Indicated Resources are for continuous areas where the majority of blocks are estimated within twice the range of the variograms which coincide with an appropriate level of data quality, quantity and confidence in the geological interpretation (equates to zones of drill spacing c. 20-50 m along strike by 10-25 m down dip). All areas outside of the Indicated Resources have been classified as Inferred. Mineral Resource classification for Reward has been based on the estimation run during the Inverse Distance Weighted process. Indicated Resources are for continuous areas where the majority of blocks are estimated within the range of the minimum drill hole spacing and which coincide with higher levels of data quality, quantity and confidence in the geological interpretation (effectively drill spacing of c. 20-50 11 m along strike and 10-20 m down dip). All areas outside of the Indicated Resources have been classified as Inferred. The Livingstone deposit is currently entirely classified as Inferred. The estimated resources are reported in Table 1 rounded to 2 significant figures in accordance with recommendations of the JORC code. Figure 8 | Plan view of Main and No.2 resource block models showing drill holes traces and sections. Figure 9 | Main and No.2 resource block model sections, locations as shown on the block model plan. 12 Figure 10 | Livingstone and Reward resource block models showing section lines and drill holes traces. Figure 11 | Livingstone and Reward resource block model sections, locations as shown on the block model plan. Reporting Cut-off grades Resources at a range of cut-offs relevant to development considerations are presented in Table 1, demonstrating grade and tonnage sensitivity to cut-off selection. A lower cut-off of 0.4% SnEQ is currently preferred for reporting of the Mt Lindsay Project Mineral Resources, taking into consideration continuity and distribution of mineralisation, metallurgical recoveries of tin, tungsten and magnetite Iron Ore, and commodity pricing. Ongoing metallurgical work, mining, processing and financial studies and commodity pricing may make different cut-offs preferable in the future. 13 Mining Factors or Assumptions The combined use of lower-grade thresholds of 0.1% Sn, 0.05% WO₃ and 15% DTR Mass Recovery, together with minimum mineralisation widths of approximately 2–4 m for wireframing and the exclusion of isolated pods of mineralisation, accounts for minimum mining widths suitable for open cut and underground mining methods. Metallurgical Factors or Assumptions Geological logging and petrography indicate the widespread occurrence of cassiterite in the deposits. Logging with a shortwave ultraviolet lamp and petrography indicates the dominant tungsten mineral is scheelite. Chalcopyrite is the dominant copper mineral. Bench and bulk metallurgical test work at commercial metallurgical laboratories supervised by Venture Minerals and consultant metallurgists established a processing flowsheet incorporating magnetic separation, gravity separation and flotation to produce tin, tungsten and magnetite Iron Ore concentrates. Pilot-scale test work on approximately 3 tonnes of representative Main and No.2 Skarn material produced a 45% Sn concentrate at an overall tin recovery of 72%, a tungsten concentrate exceeding 66% WO₃ at an overall tungsten recovery of 83%, and a 65% Fe magnetite Iron Ore concentrate at 98% recovery (refer Venture Minerals announcement to ASX dated 31 August 2012). Iron Ore mass recovery was determined for c. 90% of the assay intervals by Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) testing, and for the remaining assay intervals estimated by regression of the magnetic susceptibility according to the formula DTR Mass Recovery % = Magnetic susceptibility 10-3 SI units x 0.0318 + 4.6278 as established from the DTR work. Metallurgical bulk test work is in progress on selected mineralisation types to improve and optimise concentrate grades and recoveries. Figure 12 | High-Grade Tungsten Mineralisation at Mt Lindsay 14 Figure 12 | Scheelite (CaWO₄), the principal tungsten-bearing mineral at Mt Lindsay, fluorescing under shortwave ultraviolet light in drill core from the Main deposit. Metallurgical drill hole ML340M intersected 147 m @ 1.0% Sn and 0.20% WO₃. Refer ASX announcement dated 16 December 2021. Figure 13 | High-Grade Tin Mineralisation at Mt Lindsay Figure 13 | Cassiterite (SnO₂), the principal tin-bearing mineral at Mt Lindsay, in drill core from the Main deposit. Metallurgical drill hole ML340M intersected 147 m @ 1.0% Sn and 0.20% WO₃. Refer ASX announcement dated 16 December 2021. Authorised by the Board of Critica Limited. 15 Jacob Deysel CEO Critica Limited Level 2, 16 Altona Street, West Perth, Western Australia T: + 61 8 6279 9428 | admin@critica.limited | critica.limited Investor and Media Relations Dannika Warburton Investability Partners investors@investability.com.au JOIN CRITICA’S INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB Sign up and engage with our investor relations team Competent Persons Statement The information in this report that relates to exploration results including geology interpretation, data preparation and data quality is based on work compiled by Dr. Stuart Owen who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Dr. Owen is a permanent employee of Critica Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC code). Dr. Owen consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appear. The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource estimates for Mt Lindsay is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation prepared by Dr. Stuart Owen who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. The information includes the mining and metallurgical assumptions used in reporting the Mineral Resource. Dr. Owen has sufficient experience 16 that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code. Dr Owen consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appear. The information in this announcement that relates to previously reported Exploration Results and metallurgical test work has been extracted from the Venture Minerals Limited ASX announcements “Record Breaking Drill Intersection at Mount Lindsay – 147 metres @ 1.0% Tin” dated 16 December 2021 and “Pilot Scale Metallurgy Confirms Excellent Recoveries at Mt Lindsay” dated 31 August 2012. Critica confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in those announcements and that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from those announcements. Forward Looking Statements This ASX announcement contains certain statements that may constitute “forward looking statement”. Such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual values, results, performance achievements to differ materially from those expressed, implied or projected in any forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. Words such as “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding future production, resources or reserves and exploration results. All such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) those relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, (ii) risks relating to possible variations in reserves, grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, (iii) the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies, (iv) risks related to commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, (v) risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities, and (vi) other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properti