Announcement PDF ASX Announcement CRITICA LIMITED Level 2, 16 Altona Street, West Perth, Western CRITICA LIMITED Level 2, 16 Altona Street, West Perth, Western Australia ABN 51 119 678 385 T: +61 8 6279 9428 E: admin@critica.limited critica.limited Jupiter Pilot Plant Delivers ~14× Upgrade to ~3% TREO Concentrate, Reinforcing Low-Cost Beneficiation Pathway Critica Limited (ASX: CRI) (“Critica” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce a further significant advance in the beneficiation pathway at its Jupiter Rare Earth Project, Australia's largest clay-hosted rare earth resource, with pilot plant results upgrading feed material approximately 14× to an intermediate concentrate grading ~3% TREO. These results build on the beneficiation recovery improvements reported on 14 April 2026 and the recently announced high-purity MREO production results, continuing the progression of Jupiter’s beneficiation and downstream processing workstreams. The latest results also confirm mass rejection of approximately 95%, concentrating the rare earth minerals into ~5% of the original feed mass. By substantially reducing the volume of material reporting to downstream processing, this supports lower projected operating and capital intensity and feeds directly into the Scoping Study being progressed with Sedgman. Highlights • Pilot plant optimisation delivers intermediate concentrate grading ~3% TREO, representing a ~14× upgrade from feed • Higher-grade concentrate and ~95% mass rejection support reduced downstream processing volumes, lower projected cost intensity and Critica's continued transition from explorer to developer • Approximately 95% mass rejection achieved, concentrating rare earth minerals into ~5% of original feed mass • Strong Magnet REE recoveries maintained, including: o Nd₂O₃: 74.5% o Dy₂O₃: 74.7% o Pr₆O₁₁: 69.3% o Tb₄O₇: 65.9% • Results build on previously reported beneficiation and MREO testwork • Results directly inform the Jupiter Scoping Study and advance the flowsheet toward the next stage of development 27 May 2026 | ASX: CRI ASX: CRI 2 Critica’s CEO Jacob Deysel commented: Following the previously reported beneficiation recovery improvements and recent advancement in high-purity MREO production, ongoing pilot plant optimisation is now delivering materially higher- grade intermediate concentrate from the same feed material. Achieving an intermediate concentrate grading of approximately 3% TREO, representing a ~14× upgrade and approximately 95% mass rejection, demonstrates continued progress in Jupiter’s beneficiation pathway and the ability to significantly reduce downstream processing volumes. Importantly, Magnet Rare Earth recoveries remain strong, with Nd and Dy recoveries both above 74%. Notwithstanding the size of the Jupiter resource, the significance of these results is not only the upgrade achieved, but the quality and repeatability of the outcome. We are consistently concentrating Magnet REEs into a materially reduced processing stream while maintaining strong recoveries - exactly what a scalable and financeable flowsheet needs to demonstrate as we progress Scoping Study work and product qualification. Beneficiation Optimisation – Higher Grade Outcome Recent testwork has delivered: • Intermediate concentrate grading approximately 3% TREO • Approximately 95% mass rejection • Approximately 14× upgrade from feed to intermediate concentrate • Strong Magnet REE recoveries maintained: o Nd₂O₃: 74.5% o Dy₂O₃: 74.7% o Pr₆O₁₁: 69.3% o Tb₄O₇: 65.9% Ongoing optimisation targeting further concentrate grade improvement These outcomes demonstrate improved beneficiation performance and support ongoing optimisation of downstream processing pathways. Additional bulk sample material is being processed to support continued optimisation and downstream testwork, including production of MREO sample for product qualification. Metallurgical Test Programmes Metallurgical test programmes are continuing in parallel to assess downstream processing pathways for the higher-grade intermediate concentrate. Work remains focused on improving overall process performance and informing Sedgman’s Scoping Study activities. ASX: CRI 3 Next Steps • Continued optimisation of beneficiation and downstream processing pathways • Production of additional higher-grade intermediate concentrate for downstream testwork and product qualification • Ongoing refinement of Scoping Study inputs and process configuration • Production of final MREO product sample for qualification purposes. Authorised by the Board of Critica Limited. Jacob Deysel CEO Critica Limited Level 2, 16 Altona Street, West Perth, Western Australia T: + 61 8 6279 9428 | admin@critica.limited | critica.limited Investor and Media Relations Dannika Warburton Investability Partners investors@investability.com.au JOIN CRITICA’S INTERACTIVE INVESTOR HUB Sign up and engage with our investor relations team Critica (ASX: CRI) is rapidly advancing the Jupiter Project in WA, Australia’s largest clay-hosted rare earth resource, with a mine-to- magnet plan to meet surging AI, EV, renewables and defence demand. ASX: CRI 4 Competent Persons Statement The information in this report that relates to exploration results including geology interpretation, data preparation and data quality is based on work compiled by Dr. Stuart Owen who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Dr. Owen is a permanent employee of Critica Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC code). Dr. Owen consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appear. The Information in this announcement that relates to previous exploration results for the Projects is extracted from the following ASX announcements: • Jupiter Pilot Plant Recovery Improves to 81% MagREO – 14 April 2026 Table 1 | Jupiter pilot REE beneficiation intitial test work results Sample Feed grade Concentrate grade Recovery % Mass % 100 4.7 TREO ppm 2137 30029 66.1 Magnet REO ppm 496 7729 73.4 Heavy REO ppm 160 2290 67.3 La2O3 ppm 411 6013 68.9 CeO2 ppm 969 13149 63.8 Pr6O11 ppm 105 1549 69.3 Nd2O3 ppm 369 5840 74.5 Sm2O3 ppm 58 832 67.0 Eu2O3 ppm 12 167 64.9 Gd2O3 ppm 33 492 69.4 Tb4O7 ppm 4.0 56 65.9 Dy2O3 ppm 18 284 74.7 Ho2O3 ppm 3.0 44 69.5 Er2O3 ppm 7.3 95 61.8 Tm2O3 ppm 1.0 11 56.2 Yb2O3 ppm 5.1 65 59.2 Lu2O3 ppm 0.8 8 45.4 Y2O3 ppm 88 1235 66.3 Sc2O3 ppm 53 189 16.8 P2O5 % 0.96 11.6 56.8 Note TREO represents the sum of 14 Rare Earth Elements excluding promethium plus yttrium expressed as oxides Magnet REO represents the sum of neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium expressed as oxides Heavy REO represents the sum of the gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and yttrium expressed as oxides ASX: CRI 5 Table 2 | Jupiter drill holes used for pilot beneficiation bulk sample Hole East MGA50 GDA94 East MGA50 GDA94 RLm AHD83 Hole depth m Hole East MGA50 GDA94 East MGA50 GDA94 RLm AHD83 Hole depth m BRAC063 529494 6854087 350 55 BRRC018 530587 6852569 357 96 BRAC064 529000 6855102 348 66 BRRC046 527501 6850219 350 72 BRAC071 529741 6856997 355 41 BRRC047 526499 6850207 345 73 BRAC077 529994 6856599 352 39 BRRC061 530517 6857002 355 31 BRAC078 529744 6856606 353 67 BRRC064 530499 6855089 354 43 BRAC085 531750 6855605 357 55 BRRC068 530496 6853095 357 61 BRAC091 530253 6855601 352 66 BRRC080 528998 6853110 350 72 BRAC092 529996 6855601 351 88 JPAC003 529006 6857261 356 39 BRAC097 530750 6855099 354 62 JPAC004 529496 6857007 355 72 BRAC098 530247 6855091 353 45 JPAC005 529506 6856802 354 61 BRAC104 531501 6854598 359 54 JPAC009 529254 6856339 352 73 BRAC105 531249 6854600 358 69 JPAC028 529251 6854852 349 61 BRAC106 530998 6854600 357 63 JPAC029 529000 6854839 348 75 BRAC108 530500 6854601 355 67 JPAC030 528756 6854854 347 68 BRAC109 530249 6854598 354 62 JPAC032 527759 6855094 346 72 BRAC113 531747 6854096 361 64 JPAC034 527743 6854587 345 79 BRAC114 531247 6854103 359 82 JPAC038 528758 6854348 347 66 BRAC117 529750 6854103 351 63 JPAC059 526245 6853603 341 76 BRAC122 531249 6853597 360 66 JPAC062 529495 6853349 352 45 BRAC124 530746 6853600 357 46 JPAC063 529245 6853355 351 53 BRAC126 530242 6853597 355 47 JPAC072 526249 6853355 340 68 BRAC129 529746 6853598 352 56 JPAC073 529495 6852851 352 65 BRAC130 532246 6853100 366 66 JPAC074 529254 6852853 351 67 BRAC135 530245 6853099 355 48 JPAC077 527998 6852849 346 74 BRAC143 529996 6852600 355 67 JPAC078 527747 6852846 346 71 BRAC147 530248 6852102 356 71 JPAC081 526496 6852850 342 84 BRAC154 529496 6851596 354 78 JPAC083 525998 6852857 339 62 BRAC156 529499 6850605 357 72 JPAC085 529497 6852349 353 71 BRAC159 528749 6850601 352 73 JPAC094 525748 6852330 340 64 BRAC163 527743 6850602 349 66 JPAC105 527504 6851841 346 79 BRAC190 527249 6850191 348 65 JPAC118 527005 6851355 344 96 BRAC191 527751 6850195 351 63 JPAC130 524725 6850845 341 50 BRAC200 527249 6849800 350 53 JPAC131 525505 6850831 341 62 BRAC210 526254 6851101 343 66 JPAC140 528994 6850856 353 67 BRAC215 524254 6851101 340 44 JPAC164 528504 6849995 354 75 BRAC225 526004 6851603 341 70 JPAC165 528254 6849997 353 67 BRAC226 526250 6851602 341 69 JPAC188 530493 6852846 357 70 BRAC229 527002 6851598 344 57 JPAC190 530010 6852851 355 60 BRAC233 528000 6851600 348 99 JPAC202 531243 6853841 359 87 BRAC234 528250 6851609 349 86 JPAC203 530994 6853855 358 71 BRAC235 528496 6851602 349 94 JPAC205 530490 6853850 355 84 BRAC236 528744 6851602 350 69 JPAC209 531250 6854344 358 82 BRAC240 527752 6852095 346 87 JPAC210 530994 6854346 357 88 BRAC241 527256 6852093 345 89 JPAC217 531002 6854847 356 57 BRAC255 527498 6852604 345 68 JPAC220 530249 6854846 354 71 BRAC258 526742 6852603 343 84 JPAC221 529995 6854838 352 66 BRAC268 527750 6853104 345 80 JPAC225 530497 6855347 353 65 ASX: CRI 6 Hole East MGA50 GDA94 East MGA50 GDA94 RLm AHD8 3 Hole depth m Hole East MGA50 GDA94 East MGA50 GDA94 RLm AHD8 3 Hole dept h m BRAC272 525999 6853105 340 70 JPAC226 530247 6855340 353 73 BRAC285 526755 6853599 342 75 JPAC227 529998 6855350 352 48 BRAC287 528753 6854099 348 54 JPAC229 531245 6855845 355 61 BRAC293 529006 6854602 348 72 JPAC233 530252 6855851 352 53 BRAC294 528750 6854596 347 87 JPAC239 530310 6855603 352 59 BRAC297 527997 6854599 346 73 JPAC240 530203 6855592 352 62 BRAC298 529249 6855097 349 95 JPAC241 530154 6855596 352 55 BRAC299 528752 6855099 348 69 JPAC243 530048 6855596 352 78 BRAC301 529249 6855602 349 53 JPAC245 529899 6855610 351 61 BRAC307 529253 6856101 351 63 JPAC255 530482 6856794 354 35 BRRC011 529547 6853247 352 84 JPAC257 529989 6856792 353 65 BRRC017 530174 6852566 355 90 7 APPENDIX ONE: JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION | ‘TABLE 1’ REPORT Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Table Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.: cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g.: ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g.: submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • The Jupiter metallurgical composite tested by GAVAQ laboratory was selected from 117 Reverse Circulation (RC) and Air Core (AC) exploration and resource definition drill holes within the Jupiter resource as listed in Table 2. • The pilot metallurgical composite comprised a blend of regolith material types representative of the Jupiter resource, grades as previously announced to the ASX. • Sampling was supervised by a suitably qualified Critica geologist. Drilling techniques • Drill type (e.g.: core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc..) and details (e.g.: core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc..). • This metallurgical composite sample subject of this report was selected from seven 117 RC and AC holes drilled by DB450 and KL150 AC drill rigs operated by KTE Mining Services Pty Ltd. • Holes were drilled to blade refusal in near fresh rock (saprock). Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • The bulk RC and AC samples were visually assessed, weighed and considered representative with overall good recovery. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • All holes were qualitatively geologically logged by suitably qualified Critica geologists. • The detail of geological logging is considered sufficient for exploration and resource definition drilling. • A JORC compliant Inferred Resource for the Jupiter clay -hosted REE deposit has been previously announced to the ASX (Critica announcement to the ASX 11 February 2025). • Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field • The metallurgical composite covered 1,712 m from the 117 listed drill holes • Intervals selected from each drill hole ranged from 4 to 40 m and were collected by sampling spear from the bulk 1 m sample bags, then homogenized, weighed and dispatched to the GAVAQ pilot plant in Hai Phong, Vietnam. • Total composite sample supplied for piloting test work was c. 3.7 tonnes 8 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. • Assaying of the metallurgical composite and products was conducted by ALS Geochemistry, Perth WA • The rare earth elements were determined by lithium borate fusion followed by acid digestion of the resultant glass bead and ICP- MS finish, Fe, P and other reported major elements were determined by XRF on fused glass disks. • Suitable certified REE standards were included and reported within the expected ranges Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • The use of twinned holes is not applicable at this stage. • The metallurgical results are compatible with observed mineralogy. • Primary data is stored and documented in industry standard ways. • Assay data was as reported by ALS geochemistry and has not been adjusted in any way. Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Drill hole locations were determined by handheld GPS with a nominal accuracy of +/- 5 metres. • All coordinates and maps presented here are in the MGA Zone 50 GDA94 system. • Topographic control is provided by Worldwide 3 arc second SRTM spot height data. Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • The drill holes selected for the GAVAQ pilot metallurgical composite were part of Jupiter exploration and resource definition programs and within the Jupiter clay-hosted REE Inferred Resource as previously reported to the ASX. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • The RC and AC holes were drilled vertically along E-W drill lines • The intersected clay and saprolite zones blanket weathered syenite-monzonite basement such that downhole thickness approximates true thickness. Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • The chain of custody for the metallurgical composite from collection to dispatch to GAVAQ was managed by Critica personnel. and the level of security is considered appropriate. Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Mass balances and GAVAQ test work was monitored and reviewed by suitably qualified Critica Limited’s Chief Metallurgist Dr Dinh Hien. 9 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • The Brothers REE Project currently consists of granted Exploration Licences E59/2421, E59/2463, E59/2710, E59/2711, E59/2819, E59/2821, E59/2827, E59/2889, E59/2890, E59/2907, E59/2927, E59/2928, E59/2930, E59/2977 and E58/629. All are 100% held by Tasmanian Rare Earth Pty Ltd a wholly owned subsidiary of Critica Limited. Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Documented previous explorers within the area now covered by the Brothers Project include North Flinders Mines Ltd, CRA Exploration Pty Ltd, Spark Energy Pty Ltd, Arcadia Minerals Ltd, Babalya Gold Pty Ltd, Burmine Ltd, Equigold NL, Equinox Resources NL, Jervois Mining Ltd, Minjar Gold Pty Ltd, Mount Magnet South NL, Sons of Gwalia Ltd and David Ross. • Refer to previous Critica announcements to the ASX and also available from http://critica.limited Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The Brothers REE exploration area is situated within the Western Australian Archean Yilgarn Craton and mostly comprises Cenozoic cover sequence overlying an extensive Archaean monzogranite complex (the Big Bell Suite). Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: -easting and northing of the drill hole collar -elevation or RL of the drill hole collar -dip and azimuth of the hole -down hole length and interception depth -hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • Locations and composited intervals for the GAVAQ metallurgical composite are as listed below: All holes were vertical and collar location was determined by handheld Garmin GPS64sx considered accurate to ±5m. • All coordinates and maps presented here are in the MGA Zone 50 GDA94 system. • Topographic control is provided by Worldwide 3 arc second SRTM spot height data. • Refer to previous ASX announcements for relevant intersections and assay results. Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. • Metal equivalents have not been applied. • Refer to previous ASX announcements for relevant Jupiter project intersections and assay results. • Standard element to oxide conversion factors have been used and TREO was calculated on an unrounded basis. 10 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • The intersected clay and saprolite zones blanket weathered granitoid basement such that downhole thickness approximate true thickness. Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. • Appropriate project location maps are included in this release. Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • Refer to previous ASX announcements (also available from http://critica.limited) for relevant Jupiter project intersections and assay results. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. • GAVAQ Solutions, Vietnam was engaged by Critica Limited to undertake pilot beneficiation test work on c. 3.7 tonne blend representing the Jupiter clay-hosted REE mineralization as selected by Critica Limited’s geometallurgist. • The head grade of the composite sample as supplied and determined by ALS Geochemistry was 0.21% TREO. • GAVAQ conducted particle size analysis, multi- element geochemistry, XRD mineralogy, and gravity and magnetic separation work to identify potential process flowsheets. • The process flowsheet used to produce the results reported here comprised grinding to 100% passing 0.2 mm, scrubbing (attrition), then low intensity (800 gauss) magnetic separation to remove the magnetic iron minerals (mainly hematite and magnetite). The non-magnetic fraction was then subject to an open circuit flotation test using combined carboxylate and amine collectors, sodium silicate depressant and dextrin dispersant at selected pH and ambient temperatures. • Assaying of resultant metallurgical fractions was conducted at ALS Geochemistry, Perth WA as described above. • Feed and beneficiated grades and recoveries for the elements of interest are given in Table 1 of this announcement. • XRD shows hydrated phosphates including rhabdophane and gorceixite to be the main REE phases, and magnetite and hematite the main magnetic iron phases Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • Critica is currently conducting ongoing mineralogy and metallurgical test work, including upgrading of REEs via physical rejection of quartz, feldspar and iron oxides (including potential by-products), other flotation collectors and conditions, closed circuit flotation, and leach testing.